Fundamental aspects of auxin foliar spray applications to woody plant cuttings

HRI Research • August 15, 2019

Applying auxin as a foliar spray has several advantages over traditional quick dip methods for rooting cuttings. These include potential worker safety and application efficiency. Foliar auxin sprays are also becoming an integral part of propagation systems using automated machine-assisted sticking robotics. However, not all woody species respond to foliar spray as well as a quick dip application for rooting and there are questions concerning application timing as well as the optimal number of applications. The overall goal of the research is to better understand the fundamental aspects of foliar applied auxin to cuttings. 

OBEJECTIVE

The objective of the proposed research will be to answer basic questions about auxin movement in cuttings related to spray volume, single vs. multiple applications, and use of a surfactant. 

Research Methodology And Significance: 

Plant material: Cuttings were or will be collected from several woody plant species including hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculata), Buttonbush (Cephalanthus), and burningbush (Euonymus alatus). 

Cutting propagation: Terminal cuttings were cut to an average length of four inches and the upper two sets of leaves were left intact. Following sticking, the cuttings were placed under intermittent mist. The entire mist bed was covered in a single layer of shade cloth to reduce heat load throughout the day. Cuttings were treated with 20ml per six cuttings as a foliar spray at 1000 to 5000 ppm K-IBA to the upper and lower leaf surfaces. 5,000 ppm K-IBA as a quick dip was used as a control. 

SIGNIFICANCE:

Applying auxin as a foliar spray has several advantages over traditional quick dip methods for rooting cuttings. These include potential worker safety and application efficiency. Foliar auxin sprays are also becoming an integral part of propagation systems using automated machine-assisted sticking robotics. However, not all woody species respond to foliar spray as well as a quick dip application for rooting and there are questions concerning application timing as well as the optimal number of applications.  Therefore, the objectives of the proposed research will be to answer basic questions about auxin movement in cuttings related to spray volume, single vs. multiple applications, and use of a surfactant

OUTCOMES AND ECONOMIC RETURN ON INVESTMENT: 

One advantage of using a foliar spray to deliver auxin is reduced labor costs. Drahn (2013) compared the labor required to treat 90,000 cuttings (one Quonset house) by either quick dip or foliar spray. He estimated that treatment by quick dip required 30 labor hours (8 persons ~4 hours per person), while the foliar spray required less than 2 hours of one person’s time. A considerable savings in labor costs. However, depending on the spray concentration, K-IBA costs can be 4-times the cost of auxin used for quick dip. Therefore, understanding the interactions between auxin concentration and the optimal number of foliar sprays can directly influence both rooting success and overall costs. Completion of the proposed research should provide growers with better guidelines for applying foliar sprays related to reducing costs while maintaining high rooting success.

PRELIMINARY RESEARCH RESULTS:

In Hydrangea, the foliar K-IBA application was more effective for rooting than a quick dip, except when treated with 1,000 ppm the day after sticking (Table 1). The best rooting occurred with a treatment of 2,000 ppm the day after sticking with 94% rooting and an average of 40 roots per cutting. The remaining applications exhibited good rooting as well, but the applications of 1,000 ppm K-IBA performed better than applications of 2,000 ppm. Hydrangea cuttings did not root well at the lower auxin concentration the day after sticking (18% rooting and 2.3 roots per cutting at 1,000 ppm). This indicates that while a lower concentration may be sufficient, the cuttings needed to fully acclimate to the misting environment to root without a higher auxin concentration. This may be partly explained by the delay in sticking following transport of the cuttings that could have led to lower foliar auxin absorption. 

There were no significant differences in Hydrangea rooting when auxin application was delayed for up to 6 days after sticking. There was also no obvious additive or synergistic effect observed in rooting with multiple auxin sprays. From a practical standpoint, these data provide a window for initial auxin sprays where auxin remains effective for rooting and also indicates that there is no incentive for multiple foliar treatments in Hydrangea cuttings. 

Table 1. Rooting in Hydrangea paniculata ‘Limelight’ cuttings treated with 1,000 or 2,000 ppm IBA foliar sprays at different times after sticking.

Application time IBA [ppm] Rooting (%) Roots per cutting Roots per rooted cutting
After sticking 1,000 18.0 dx 2.3 d 6.6
2,000 94.4 a 40.4 a 41.6
Day 2 1,000 80.5 b 34.0 ab 44.7

Share This Post

Blurry green foliage filling the frame
By Jennifer Gray May 28, 2026
Soilless Substrate Science (S3) is a national transdisciplinary collaboration developed to support growers as we advance to the next generation of substrates. Our team is leading North American efforts to develop new substrate materials and techniques, and working with growers to support implementation, as we support the global transition to substrates that go Beyond Peat. In this webinar, Dr. Jeb Fields will discuss the S3 team efforts surrounding identification of new substrate materials, processing and development, and grower support. We will explore wood fiber processing, sugarcane bagasse substrate development, stabilization of organic fibers, databasing substrate materials, and opportunities for growers to get involved. Overall, attendees will learn about US efforts to develop domestically-sourced substrates and advance substrate science as we move towards the next generation of substrate science. Our Speaker Dr. Jeb Fields is a production horticulturist who works with growers in Florida and throughout the country to support more effective and efficient production practices through his environmental nursery research program. Jeb’s primary interests include growing media & substrate science, irrigation & fertilizer management, whole plant-water relations and plant abiotic stress physiology. Jeb is an internationally recognized substrate scientist, the leader of the Beyond Peat project through the USDA Specialty Crops Research Initiative, and the national S3 (Soilless Substrate Science) team which pursues advancements of the global substrate industry and development sustainable substrate materials and practices, including substrate stratification. Jeb is the editor for Nursery & Landscape Insider, a biweekly e-newsletter from Ball Publishing, that reaches over 32,000 stakeholders worldwide. For his efforts, he has been recognized with numerous awards, honors, and leadership positions. Prior to joining UF, Jeb was a professor and research station director with the LSU AgCenter. Jeb studied at UF for his B.S., NC State University for his M.S., and Virginia Tech for his Ph.D. – with all degrees focusing on production horticulture.
A soft-focus background of varying shades of green, suggesting grass, foliage, or a forest landscape.
By Jennifer Gray April 9, 2026
This webinar dives into the problem of rose rosette virus. Shrub roses consist of multiple canes attached to a root system and produce beautiful spring growth in the form of new flowering stems and branches. Experts will provide an overview of how rose rosette virus first attacks flowering growth and can move throughout the stem. At the same time rosette symptoms appear in mature distinct stems of a plant and may be absent from others. The research delves into understanding how the vascular system connects the flowering stems and above ground canes. The research is to understand how virus movement between adjacent stems and only appears to cause disease in a few but not all canes of the same plant. This research is important to explore potential management approaches to safeguard rose.
By Jennifer Gray March 24, 2026
The horticulture industry continues to change as new technologies, production practices, and consumer expectations reshape the marketplace. Research plays an essential role in helping growers, landscapers, and retailers adapt and succeed. That’s exactly where the Horticultural Research Institute (HRI) enters the chat. Every year, HRI selects and funds research projects that advance horticulture. In 2026, HRI is investing more than $560,000 in 18 research projects that target challenges across the horticultural supply chain, including plant production, pest and disease management, landscape plant performance, and consumer insights. “What makes HRI research so valuable is that it focuses on real challenges the industry is facing right now,” said Mark Yelanich, HRI President and Research Director at Metrolina Greenhouses. “The 2026 HRI-funded projects were selected because they develop knowledge, processes, or tools that businesses can actually use.” HRI’s four strategic research priorities guide funding decisions, focusing on quantifying plant benefits, creating innovative solutions, gathering consumer insights, and producing practical solutions to industry challenges. The 2026 projects reflect these priorities across the horticulture supply chain.
Show More